Doorgaan naar hoofdcontent

Integrating BPM and Social Media

I find it interesting to note that there are a lot of Social Media Tools out there.
If you google on "social media tool" you get 2.650.000 hits. 



When you do the same for "bpm tool" you get 14.600 hits.


You can say that there are of course a lot of small social media tools and that a BPM tool is a lot complexer.
Would it be wrong to ask myself if we could help business with (mostly free) social media tools instead of a (mostly more expensive) BPM tools?
Some arguments in favor of social media tools, i can think of:
  • Mostly for free
  • There are a lot
  • Mostly simple
  • Fun to work with
There are also some disadvantages i can think of:
  • How long will the tool exist?
  • How secure is it?
  • Can it handle a lot of users?
  • Can it handle the performance that is sometimes required?
  • What is the support?
  • Integration with other tools?
So probably the disadvantages will block CIOs from using them in business critical business processes, but maybe they can be very valuable in using for other business processes.

Some arguments in favor of BPM tools:
  • More secure because used on-premise
  • More support and documentation
  • More auditing information out-of-the-box
  • BAM
  • Better integration support with other systems
Some disadvantages:
  • Expensive
  • Complex

But how about a more Hybrid solution in which BPM and Social Media tools are used together or even integrated.
You already see this within the Cordys stack (integration with Google) and Oracle (uses collaboration tools).

I think we will see a lot more from this in 2011.

What are your thoughts on this?

Reacties

  1. This is a second (briefer) attempt to add a reaction:

    BPM tools and social media in general both have certain unique capablities that are not mutually exchangeble.

    What I am missing in the article is a specification of the type of business problems you want to solve using either one of these concepts/tools.

    Maybe a simple workflow could be implemented by both types, a complex BP with sophisticated BAM is something else.

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  2. @Harald: Thanks for the feedback!

    Maybe the article is somewhat misleading but what I am trying to say is that probably the conjunction of the two, will be strong. So use BPM and Social Media together and integrate them.
    Maybe a lot of processes are not catchable within a tide BPM process or even a in case management solution.
    A good question is what will be the type of business problems the integration will solve.

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  3. I agree that the social WEB2.0 aspects should be taken into account. Several BPMS offer already User collaboration environments themselves, which already implementing social WEB2.0 functionality.

    Cloud integration is also becoming a standard BPMS feature, that together with Social Media vendors API-s I allow for integration of BPM en SM in a fair extend, which most likely will solve the business needs.

    But maybe you can think of an process example that is not covered by these functionalities?

    Regards, Harald

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen

Een reactie posten

Populaire posts van deze blog

OSB 10gR3 and SWA and MTOM

This blog is about using soap with attachments and the use of MTOM within the OSB (10gR3). A service is created that accepts a soap with attachment (DocumentService) and translates it to a service that accepts a binary element. MTOM is used for performance reasons for the second. Some notes: * For the use of attachments you need RPC-style document instead of the usual document-style. This due to the fact that the document-style limits a message to a single . * A service can not have both SWA and MTOM within OSB. First a WSDL is setup for the DocumentService: The $attachments variable holds the attachments and the body holds the attachment data. Also other data is stored within the attachment element (see h

Microservices mindmap

"The tree" - See also   my photo page When you are fairly new within the Microservices land, there are a lot of terms fired at you. So also for my own understanding i have made a mindmap. I think it has a good status now, so that i can share it with you. As always feedback is very welcome ! You can download the mindmap here .

Book review: Data Management at Scale (Piethein Strengholt)

 This blog is a review of the book "Data Management at Scale (See also at bol.com ) Data Management is a hot topic nowadays and this book does a fantastic job at adding value to this topic. It is a must read and one of the few technical books I finished reading in a weekend. The book gives a fantastic overview on how to implement a Data Mesh data architecture. The Data Mesh concept is explained by Martin Fowler here . The book is a good mix between conceptual and implementation architecture level. It gives a lot of examples of how this architecture at scale can work, for both small and big companies. It is practical and I used it to implement it at one of my customers. The book describes an architecture in which the focus is on the DIAL (Data- and Integration Access Layer).  On a high level the book covers the following topics: The key principles for data management at scale - Domain-Driven Design  - Domain Data Stores - Meta data management Ready Data Store The concept of servin